Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
Multiple Comparisons Correction Quiz
Practice why repeated testing inflates false positives and distinguish family-wise error control from false-discovery-rate procedures.
Question 1 of 8
With 20 independent true nulls tested at 0.05, what is the approximate chance of at least one false positive?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- With 20 independent true nulls tested at 0.05, what is the approximate chance of at least one false positive?
- 0.64
- 0.05
- 0.20
- 0.95
- For 10 tests and family-wise alpha 0.05, what per-test cutoff does Bonferroni use?
- 0.05
- 0.005
- 0.5
- 0.0005
- Which error criterion does Bonferroni target?
- Average prediction error
- Expected fraction of false discoveries only
- Family-wise error rate
- False omission rate
- What does FDR concern among rejected hypotheses?
- The variance of all test statistics
- The chance every rejection is false
- The probability of any single miss
- The expected proportion that are false
- Why might analysts prefer an FDR procedure for a large discovery search?
- It guarantees each finding is true
- It can offer more power while controlling a discovery proportion criterion
- It avoids defining the test family
- It removes the need for replication
- Why define the hypothesis family before examining results?
- It guarantees independence
- It makes all p-values equal
- The family determines which comparisons need joint interpretation
- It ensures no data are missing
- What does a corrected p-value not fix?
- The chosen alpha threshold
- Multiplicity itself
- The stated family size
- Confounding or invalid measurement
- After an adjusted exploratory discovery, what is a useful next step?
- Seek independent validation or replication
- Declare a confirmed mechanism immediately
- Remove all non-significant outcomes from the report
- Retest until the p-value falls further
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.