Guide-linked quiz · Hard Level
Nested Cross-Validation Quiz
Check inner and outer fold roles, preprocessing leakage and fit-count calculations in a practical nested cross-validation workflow.
Question 1 of 8
Within one outer split, which data may the inner hyperparameter search use?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- Within one outer split, which data may the inner hyperparameter search use?
- All examples, including the outer test fold
- Only the outer training data
- Only the outer test labels
- The full dataset after fitting preprocessing globally
- Why can reporting the best inner validation score overstate model performance?
- Inner cross-validation evaluates every candidate on its own training rows
- Averaging across folds removes all uncertainty from candidate rankings
- The best inner score already includes an independent outer evaluation
- Choosing the best setting also selects favorable variation in validation scores
- Five outer folds, three inner folds and ten candidate settings require how many inner candidate fits in the guide's example?
- 150
- 18
- 50
- 30
- A scaler is fitted on the full dataset before nested cross-validation begins. Which problem remains?
- Using more outer folds automatically removes preprocessing leakage
- Unsupervised preprocessing cannot use information relevant to evaluation
- Preprocessing has already accessed held-out information
- A scaler can safely see test inputs whenever it does not see test labels
- Different outer folds select different hyperparameters. How should this be interpreted?
- It proves the cross-validation code is broken
- It can occur because each selection step sees different training data
- It means only the highest-scoring outer model is valid
- It requires replacing outer evaluation with training accuracy
- A dataset contains many rows per customer, and deployment targets unseen customers. Which design addresses that dependence?
- Shuffle all rows separately in the outer loop only
- Group customers only after evaluation is complete
- Fit the feature selector globally before splitting
- Keep customer groups separated in both inner and outer splits
- After evaluating a fixed nested procedure, how does the guide recommend obtaining a final model?
- Run the selection procedure on development data and fit the chosen configuration
- Deploy the outer-fold model with the highest observed test score
- Choose the configuration from the single best inner-fold result
- Choose final settings by comparing candidates on the reserved test set
- Why is the spread of outer-fold scores not automatically a confidence interval?
- Each outer score is an independent measurement from an unrelated training set
- The raw standard deviation of fold scores is itself a confidence interval
- The fitted models share much of their training data
- Averaging fold scores removes all sampling uncertainty
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.