Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
Partial Dependence Plots Quiz
Use partial dependence and ICE carefully, including their averaging logic, correlation caveats, output choices and noncausal interpretation.
Question 1 of 8
How does a single-feature partial dependence value at one grid point arise?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- How does a single-feature partial dependence value at one grid point arise?
- Average observed feature values without model predictions
- Fit a new model using only the selected column
- Average model predictions after setting that feature to the grid value
- Count how many examples have that exact value
- What does an ICE display add beyond a partial dependence average?
- A causal effect estimate
- A prediction curve for each individual example
- A guarantee that features are independent
- A new model trained for every row
- ICE lines fan apart as a feature changes. What does this suggest?
- The average represents every example's response equally well
- The selected feature has the same additive response for every case
- Only the baseline prediction levels differ while curve shapes remain parallel
- The average may hide heterogeneous model responses
- Why can correlated predictors make a partial dependence plot misleading?
- Substitution can create unrealistic feature combinations
- Averaging automatically removes all feature dependence
- Keeping other inputs fixed guarantees a valid intervention
- Restricting a feature to its observed range guarantees every joint combination is realistic
- What kind of claim does a partial dependence curve support most directly?
- The causal effect of changing a feature
- The model's calibration on every subgroup
- How this fitted model's average output varies under the plot calculation
- The distribution of true labels at each feature value
- For a classifier, what should a report specify about the plotted output?
- Only whether a classifier exceeds 50% accuracy
- Class and output scale, such as probability or decision score
- Only the ranking of feature variances
- Only whether the predictions were rounded to labels
- Which alternative may reduce extrapolation concerns under dependent features by estimating local changes?
- A marginal plot without checking confounding inputs
- An uncentered ICE plot that uses the same unrestricted substitutions
- A global feature ranking based only on training coefficients
- Accumulated local effects
- Centered ICE is useful for comparing what across examples?
- Differences in curve shape after subtracting a reference prediction
- Only differences in the original prediction baselines
- The distribution of observed outcomes without model predictions
- Causal treatment effects for each example
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.