Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
Permutation Feature Importance Quiz
Test shuffle-based score changes, correlated-feature pitfalls and the limits of causal claims when interpreting permutation importance.
Question 1 of 8
A higher-is-better score falls from 0.82 to 0.70 after one input is shuffled. Which importance value follows?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- A higher-is-better score falls from 0.82 to 0.70 after one input is shuffled. Which importance value follows?
- 0.12
- 0.70
- 0.82
- 1.52
- During a basic permutation-importance test, which part of the dataset is deliberately rearranged?
- All feature columns and outcomes together
- The fitted model's parameter values
- One feature's values across evaluation rows
- Only the outcome labels while all inputs stay fixed
- Two nearly identical sensor columns each receive low individual permutation importance. Which explanation is consistent with the guide?
- Neither sensor can contain useful information
- All low-importance features must be deleted immediately
- The metric has necessarily been calculated backward
- The model can use one sensor when the other is shuffled
- Why should an analyst repeat the shuffle for each input?
- To retrain the model on every permutation
- To examine variation caused by different random rearrangements
- To ensure importance values sum to one
- To force every input to have positive importance
- How does permutation importance differ from fitting a new model after removing a feature?
- Permutation importance keeps the existing fitted model fixed
- Permutation importance always changes the outcome labels
- Feature removal cannot change predictive performance
- Feature removal and shuffling are mathematically identical
- An input has negative permutation importance across some shuffles. What happened in those measurements?
- The baseline score was necessarily negative
- The feature was uncorrelated with every other input
- The shuffled score was higher than the baseline score
- The absolute magnitude of the importance was calculated instead of its sign
- A feature ranks highly in a permutation report. Which claim would exceed what the test establishes?
- The fitted model's score dropped when the feature was shuffled
- The result depends on the chosen metric
- The ranking should be interpreted with the evaluation data
- Changing that feature in the real world must cause the outcome to change
- Before treating a permutation ranking as useful evidence, which check does the guide recommend?
- Confirm that training-set accuracy alone is high
- Confirm that the fitted model predicts usefully on evaluation data
- Confirm that every importance is greater than zero
- Confirm that individual importances sum to one
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.