Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level

Permutation Feature Importance Quiz

Test shuffle-based score changes, correlated-feature pitfalls and the limits of causal claims when interpreting permutation importance.

Question 1 of 8

A higher-is-better score falls from 0.82 to 0.70 after one input is shuffled. Which importance value follows?

Preview every question8 questions

Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.

  1. A higher-is-better score falls from 0.82 to 0.70 after one input is shuffled. Which importance value follows?
    • 0.12
    • 0.70
    • 0.82
    • 1.52
  2. During a basic permutation-importance test, which part of the dataset is deliberately rearranged?
    • All feature columns and outcomes together
    • The fitted model's parameter values
    • One feature's values across evaluation rows
    • Only the outcome labels while all inputs stay fixed
  3. Two nearly identical sensor columns each receive low individual permutation importance. Which explanation is consistent with the guide?
    • Neither sensor can contain useful information
    • All low-importance features must be deleted immediately
    • The metric has necessarily been calculated backward
    • The model can use one sensor when the other is shuffled
  4. Why should an analyst repeat the shuffle for each input?
    • To retrain the model on every permutation
    • To examine variation caused by different random rearrangements
    • To ensure importance values sum to one
    • To force every input to have positive importance
  5. How does permutation importance differ from fitting a new model after removing a feature?
    • Permutation importance keeps the existing fitted model fixed
    • Permutation importance always changes the outcome labels
    • Feature removal cannot change predictive performance
    • Feature removal and shuffling are mathematically identical
  6. An input has negative permutation importance across some shuffles. What happened in those measurements?
    • The baseline score was necessarily negative
    • The feature was uncorrelated with every other input
    • The shuffled score was higher than the baseline score
    • The absolute magnitude of the importance was calculated instead of its sign
  7. A feature ranks highly in a permutation report. Which claim would exceed what the test establishes?
    • The fitted model's score dropped when the feature was shuffled
    • The result depends on the chosen metric
    • The ranking should be interpreted with the evaluation data
    • Changing that feature in the real world must cause the outcome to change
  8. Before treating a permutation ranking as useful evidence, which check does the guide recommend?
    • Confirm that training-set accuracy alone is high
    • Confirm that the fitted model predicts usefully on evaluation data
    • Confirm that every importance is greater than zero
    • Confirm that individual importances sum to one

Keep testing yourself

More quizzes picked for your level.

View all quizzes