Guide-linked quiz · Hard Level
PESQ and STOI Speech Quality Metrics Quiz
Check what PESQ and STOI estimate, what reference signals they need, and how their score outputs should be interpreted in speech evaluation.
Question 1 of 8
What does PESQ estimate when comparing a degraded speech signal with a reference?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- What does PESQ estimate when comparing a degraded speech signal with a reference?
- Perceived speech quality
- The transcript’s word error rate
- The speaker’s identity
- The network’s packet latency
- What does STOI primarily predict?
- Audio bitrate
- Speech intelligibility
- Speaker identity
- Reverberation time
- Both PESQ and STOI are described as 'intrusive' metrics. What does that mean?
- They damage the audio file
- They can only run in real time
- They require a clean reference signal for comparison
- They need human listeners
- What is the commonly reported output range for STOI?
- -0.5 to 4.5
- 1 to 100
- 0 to 10
- 0 to 1
- PESQ models human hearing using which kind of perceptual frequency scale?
- Bark/loudness bands
- Linear Hz spacing
- MIDI note numbers
- Decibel-only weighting
- Why are non-intrusive metrics like DNSMOS attracting interest as alternatives?
- They produce lower scores
- They need no clean reference signal
- They only work for music
- They are part of ITU-T P.862
- What use case did the original ITU-T P.862 Recommendation describe for PESQ?
- Identifying speakers in music recordings
- Transcribing wideband speech into text
- Predicting subjective quality of narrow-band telephone speech and codecs
- Measuring network packet delay
- What is the current ITU status of Recommendation P.862 (PESQ)?
- An active current recommendation for all speech domains
- A required open-source software package
- A standard only for speaker diarization
- Superseded and withdrawn; the recommendation was deleted
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.