AI Policy Statements for Course Syllabi Quiz

Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.

1. What are the three common positions a syllabus AI statement takes?
   • Free, paid and enterprise
   • Beginner, intermediate and advanced
   • No use, limited or conditional use, and open use with disclosure
   • Weekly, monthly and yearly
2. Why should a statement name specific activities instead of just saying "AI use"?
   • Students need to tell apart activities like brainstorming, drafting and editing
   • Named activities make the syllabus longer, which is better
   • Because AI companies require it
   • It is not necessary
3. What does a course ban need to be enforceable?
   • A longer syllabus
   • A detector subscription
   • Stricter punishments only
   • Assessment design such as in-class writing, oral checks or staged drafts
4. Why is "no AI" not as clear as it sounds?
   • AI does not exist in schools
   • Grammar checkers, search engines and word processors now include AI features
   • All students already know what it means
   • Because it is written in legal language
5. What is a good way to make disclosures consistent and easy to grade?
   • Let students disclose however they like
   • Ban all disclosure
   • Give a fill-in template: tool, date, purpose, prompts, what you changed
   • Only accept verbal disclosures
6. How should suspected misuse be judged?
   • Mainly on process evidence such as drafts, version history and a conversation
   • Only on an AI detector score
   • By a vote of classmates
   • By the length of the essay
7. Why should a syllabus statement consider accessibility?
   • Accessibility rules do not apply to AI
   • It makes the statement shorter
   • Accessibility only matters for videos
   • Some students use assistive tools with AI features as approved accommodations
8. Where else should the AI rule appear besides the syllabus?
   • Nowhere else
   • On each assignment brief and in the learning management system
   • Only in the final exam
   • On social media