Back to News
EnterpriseAI Understanding briefing

The Straits Times reports DBS says more than 70% of staff use AI as hiring and training expand

DBS says more than 70% of its employees use AI tools, while the bank expands AI-related hiring, internal mobility and career guidance for workers affected by changing roles.

By 5 min read
AI-generated editorial illustration accompanying The Straits Times reports DBS says more than 70% of staff use AI as hiring and training expand
The short version

DBS says more than 70% of its employees use AI tools, while the bank expands AI-related hiring, internal mobility and career guidance for workers affected by changing roles.

What happened

The Straits Times reports that DBS Bank has made generative AI broadly available across its 19 markets through tools including DBS GPT and Microsoft Copilot. The bank says more than 70% of employees use AI tools and generate more than 1.8 million prompts each month. DBS is also expanding hiring in AI, data, wealth management, risk management and cybersecurity, while building internal support for workers whose roles may change.

In a report published on Aug. 24 and updated on Aug. 25, The Straits Times describes an interview with Lee Yan Hong, DBS Bank’s head of group human resources. Lee characterized AI as a manageable leadership opportunity rather than a crisis, arguing that it can help workers compensate for limits on how much information they can read, compare and synthesize. She compared that role to cars helping people overcome physical limits, while describing AI as a tool for cognitive work. These are Lee’s views as reported by The Straits Times, not an independently verified assessment of AI’s effects at DBS.

The Straits Times reports that DBS began experimenting with generative AI more actively in 2023, after ChatGPT became more mainstream. The bank supplied employees with tools including its in-house DBS GPT and Microsoft Copilot, and encouraged use across 19 markets instead of waiting for employees to adopt such systems informally. According to Lee, more than 70% of DBS employees now use AI tools, with more than 1.8 million prompts generated each month across the bank’s markets. The report does not independently verify those figures, define active use or explain how prompts are counted.

The report gives two examples of how DBS is applying AI to HR work. Lee said an executive performance-review process that previously took about eight hours to assemble can now produce a first draft in roughly five minutes, leaving more time for human deliberation before a committee makes a final decision. The bank also uses AI to help screen resumes, particularly where a single job posting in India may receive between 10,000 and 100,000 applications, according to Lee. The Straits Times reports that candidates still undergo psychometric and technical assessments and interviews, and that DBS has not outsourced hiring entirely to AI.

Read the primary source: straitstimes.com

Why it matters

The report offers a concrete example of AI adoption being managed as a workforce and operating-model issue rather than only as a software purchase. DBS says AI is being used in human-resources work, including producing a first draft of senior-executive performance evaluations, while human committees retain responsibility for final decisions. The claims come from DBS’s head of group human resources and have not been independently confirmed.

The DBS example matters because it connects AI adoption to decisions about jobs, skills and management practices. The Straits Times reports that DBS has invested millions of dollars in technology, including AI subscriptions, and that Lee views reducing repetitive work as a way to create capacity for growth. The bank’s reported approach treats AI as an augmentation tool: systems may prepare material or apply consistent screening criteria, while people are expected to make consequential judgments. The article does not provide independent productivity audits, financial results attributable to AI or evidence that the reported time savings generalize beyond Lee’s examples.

The hiring discussion also exposes a central tension in workplace AI. DBS says automated screening can help apply skills-based criteria consistently when application volumes are too large for manual review, potentially reducing some forms of human inconsistency. At the same time, screening systems can turn recruitment into keyword matching, and the article provides no model details, error rates, demographic analysis or appeal process. Lee said AI raises the baseline in writing and coding tests because candidates can reach similar answers with assistance; in her account, applicants must distinguish themselves through deeper thinking and stronger solutions. That conclusion remains a management judgment rather than a measured finding.

The workforce implications extend beyond efficiency. The Straits Times reports that DBS plans to take in more than 500 young graduates through management-associate, internship and traineeship programs in 2026, and that it had hired 112 management associates by the time of the interview. New hires in Singapore were reportedly up about 10% from the same period in 2025, while Singapore attrition was reported at 2.8%. DBS is also encouraging internal mobility, including possible moves by call-center staff into relationship-management or support roles after acquiring relevant qualifications. These figures and plans are reported by the newspaper and have not been independently confirmed.

What to watch next

The practical test will be whether DBS can demonstrate measurable productivity gains without weakening hiring quality, employee development or accountability. The Straits Times reports that the bank is training HR staff as career advisers and has signed a memorandum of understanding with the Institute of Banking and Finance. More information is needed on the results of these programs, the safeguards around AI-assisted screening and how many employees move into redesigned roles.

The first question is whether the reported scale of use translates into verifiable improvements. DBS has disclosed employee-use and prompt-volume figures, but The Straits Times does not report how much time or money the bank saves overall, whether AI-generated drafts require substantial correction, or whether customer, compliance or operational outcomes have changed. Future reporting should distinguish simple experimentation from sustained use in important workflows and should examine whether employees are using approved systems with appropriate data protections.

The second question is how DBS governs AI-assisted recruitment and evaluation. The bank’s reported human assessments and interviews are important controls, but the source does not explain how models are tested for disparate error rates, how candidates can challenge an automated recommendation, what data are retained, or which decisions must remain human. The source also does not establish whether the five-minute performance-review first draft is accurate, comprehensive or reliable across different roles. Those unknowns limit what can be concluded from the bank’s examples.

The third question is whether the bank’s career-transition commitments produce real opportunities for existing workers. The Straits Times reports that more than 100 members of DBS’s 500-person HR team were trained as career advisers and that DBS signed a memorandum of understanding with the Institute of Banking and Finance to build AI capabilities, support transitions into redesigned roles and strengthen the financial sector’s talent pipeline. The article does not give implementation timelines, funding, enrollment, completion or placement data. Those measures will show whether the initiative is a durable workforce program or primarily a communication and training effort.

Related guides & quizzes

AI EthicsAI TrainingAI Models ExplainedFuture of AITest what you know — try a free AI quizLook up an AI term in our glossary
Found this useful?