Back to News
PolicyAI Understanding briefing

Xi pitches open-source AI cooperation at BRICS summit

The Japan Times reports that Xi Jinping proposed a BRICS community for open-source AI cooperation, including large-language-model development, seminars and training.

4 min readRead the original reporting
Source-provided image accompanying Xi pitches open-source AI cooperation at BRICS summit
Attributed reportingSource recorded
Publisher
japantimes.co.jp
Source link
japantimes.co.jphttps://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/09/14/world/politics/xi-ai-brics-summit-china-us/
Source type
Reporting by a news outlet — not a first-party document.

What we could not confirm independently: This claim is attributed to the named outlet. We did not verify it against a first-party document. (japantimes.co.jp)

ContextUnderstand this in 60 seconds

Start here

Key terms

Compute
The processing resources required to train and run models, often measured in FLOPS or GPU hours.
Dataset
A collection of structured or unstructured examples used for training, validation, or testing.
Test yourselfAI Models Explained Quiz

What happened

The Japan Times reports that Chinese President Xi Jinping proposed a BRICS “community” for open-source AI cooperation and invited BRICS members to join a Beijing-backed organization involving nearly 30 countries.

The Japan Times reports that Xi spoke in New Delhi on Sunday and said China would lead the creation of a BRICS “community” for open-source AI. According to the report, the proposed cooperation would support the development and application of large language models, as well as AI seminars and training courses for BRICS members.

The report says Xi had invited BRICS nations a day earlier to join a new group established by Beijing and involving nearly 30 countries, which he called the World AI Cooperation Organization. Xi urged BRICS to strengthen AI cooperation and encourage “open source, openness, collaboration and sharing.” The supplied report does not identify the participating countries, provide a formal founding document or independently verify the organizations’ operating arrangements.

Source details: japantimes.co.jp

Why it matters

The proposal places AI development, access and skills training within a diplomatic cooperation framework rather than leaving them solely to commercial companies or individual governments. If implemented, it could give emerging-economy institutions a channel for sharing large-language-model expertise and applications. The report does not establish whether China has released a model, committed funding or offered usable infrastructure. It also does not independently confirm the initiative’s membership, governance, technical standards, safety requirements or practical availability.

The reported initiative could matter because it frames AI capacity-building as an international cooperation project involving model development, deployment and training. That approach could be practically relevant for countries seeking access to AI expertise and infrastructure outside established U.S.- and China-centered commercial channels. However, the source provides no evidence that a model, computing resource, dataset, course or service is currently available to the public or to BRICS members.

The announcement also signals that China is using AI cooperation as part of its broader international engagement. Any effect on the global AI ecosystem will depend on implementation: the licensing terms for any released systems, the openness of the technical stack, the reliability of training support and the safeguards applied to high-impact uses. Those details remain unknown, and the Japan Times account is not independently confirmed in the supplied material.

What to watch next

The key tests will be whether the proposed community receives a formal charter, publishes membership and governance details, releases models or tools under verifiable open-source licenses, and provides the promised seminars or training. No access terms, pricing, launch schedule, funding commitments or model specifications are documented in the supplied report. It is also unclear how the initiative would interact with export controls, existing international AI organizations and national safety rules.

A formal membership list and charter for the proposed BRICS community and World AI Cooperation Organization would clarify whether these are operating institutions or initiatives still being organized. The report does not state when either group will begin work.

Any subsequent model or tool release should be assessed for its license, technical documentation, compute requirements, language coverage, safety testing and actual availability. The supplied source gives no price, access mechanism, performance result or release date.

Governments’ positions on data sharing, export controls, training standards and accountability will show whether the proposal becomes a practical AI cooperation mechanism. The report does not describe reactions from other BRICS members or independent evaluations of China’s plans.

Related guides & quizzes

AI Models ExplainedFuture of AIAI EthicsTest what you know — try a free AI quizLook up an AI term in our glossary
Found this useful?