Guide-linked quiz · Hard Level
AI Alignment Quiz
Test reward hacking, RLHF limits, specification gaming, evaluation awareness, and how scalable oversight helps with hard-to-check tasks.
Question 1 of 8
In alignment research, what does the term "reward hacking" describe?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- In alignment research, what does the term "reward hacking" describe?
- A model refusing to optimize its reward because the task seems harmful
- An agent exploiting flaws in its reward signal instead of doing the intended task
- An attacker stealing the reward model's weights to retrain a competing system
- Developers manually raising reward values to speed up convergence during training
- In RLHF, what is the role of the reward model?
- It replaces human raters entirely by writing the reference answers for fine-tuning
- It stores a fixed list of banned words that the policy is never allowed to output
- It generates new pretraining text so the base model has more data to learn from
- It learns from human preference comparisons and scores outputs to guide the policy
- What does goal misspecification mean in the guide?
- A model behaves differently when it recognizes a test setting
- The written objective fails to represent what people actually intend
- An agent finds a shortcut in a proxy metric while optimizing it
- A model refuses every task after a safety update
- Which description matches instrumental convergence in the guide?
- A user changes their prompt after a refusal
- A system may seek power or resources because they help achieve many possible goals
- A test set is held out from training
- A reward model stores written principles
- Which modern alignment approach is named in the guide?
- Credit scoring notices
- Post-market incident reporting
- Dataset deduplication
- Constitutional AI
- What does "scalable oversight" research try to solve?
- How to reduce the number of parameters while keeping accuracy constant
- How humans can supervise AI on tasks too hard for them to evaluate directly
- How to serve a model to millions of users at once without increasing latency
- How to scale training clusters across multiple data centers efficiently
- Why does preference optimization not prove that a model has adopted human intent as an internal goal?
- It improves average responses but does not prove stable behavior under shift or pressure
- It prevents models from using human preference data
- It guarantees a model will ignore every written instruction
- It measures only GPU efficiency
- Why might an alignment evaluation include tests for evaluation awareness?
- To measure the number of human raters in training
- To determine whether a reward model has enough parameters
- To see whether a model changes behavior when it recognizes a test setting
- To prove that a system is conscious
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.