Guide-linked quiz · Medium Level
Amazon's Scrapped AI Recruiting Tool Quiz
Tests how Amazon's résumé model learned bias from historical hiring labels, why removing gendered words failed, and how proxy variables leak.
Question 1 of 8
What data was Amazon's recruiting model trained on?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- What data was Amazon's recruiting model trained on?
- Anonymous public job postings from competitors
- Résumés submitted to Amazon over a ten-year period
- Synthetic résumés generated to be gender-balanced
- Performance reviews of current senior executives only
- Which word did Reuters report the model penalized?
- "Manager"
- "Executed"
- "Captured"
- "Women's"
- Why did editing the model to ignore specific gendered terms fail to solve the problem?
- There was no guarantee the model would not find other proxies to sort candidates in discriminatory ways
- The edits made the model reject every applicant
- The law forbade any changes to the model
- The edits deleted all training data
- What is the central lesson about the training label in this case?
- Labels should always be generated at random
- The model had too few parameters to learn fairly
- The label reflected past hiring decisions, which contained bias
- Labels do not affect what a model learns
- Which verbs did the model reportedly favor because they appeared more often on men's résumés?
- "Led" and "built"
- "Executed" and "captured"
- "Designed" and "coded"
- "Managed" and "supported"
- What is the selective labels problem in hiring models?
- Recruiters choose which labels to delete
- Models can only read résumés shorter than one page
- Only certain job titles are allowed as labels
- Outcomes are observed only for people who were hired, so rejected candidates' potential is never measured
- Under the four-fifths rule of thumb, what signals possible adverse impact?
- One group's selection rate is below 80 percent of the highest group's rate
- More than four-fifths of applicants are rejected
- A model uses more than five features
- Fewer than four in five recruiters approve the tool
- What does New York City's Local Law 144 require of employers using automated employment decision tools?
- A ban on all AI in hiring
- Paying candidates who are rejected by software
- An independent bias audit and a published summary of results
- Registering every applicant with the city
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.