Guide-linked quiz · Hard Level
AI Fairness Metrics: Demographic Parity to Equalized Odds Quiz
Tests demographic parity, equal opportunity and equalized odds with a worked loan example, the impossibility results, and the Fairlearn and AIF360 tools.
Question 1 of 8
In the guide's loan example, group A has a 40% selection rate and group B has a 20% selection rate. Which metric does this violate?
Preview every question8 questions
Answers and explanations appear as you take the quiz.
- In the guide's loan example, group A has a 40% selection rate and group B has a 20% selection rate. Which metric does this violate?
- Equal opportunity
- Demographic parity
- Calibration
- Individual fairness
- Equal opportunity requires which quantity to be equal across groups?
- False positive rate
- Selection rate
- True positive rate
- Positive predictive value
- What does equalized odds add on top of equal opportunity?
- Equal false positive rates
- Equal selection rates
- Equal group sizes
- Equal base rates
- In the example, group B's false positive rate is 6 of 80. Why is the denominator 80?
- It is the number of approved applicants
- It is the total population of both groups
- It is 100 minus the 20 approved applicants
- It is the number of group B applicants who would not repay
- What do the impossibility results from Chouldechova and Kleinberg et al. say?
- No model can be accurate for more than one group
- When base rates differ, an imperfect classifier cannot satisfy predictive parity or calibration together with equal false positive and false negative rates
- Demographic parity always implies equalized odds
- Fairness metrics apply only to linear models
- Why does removing the protected attribute from the inputs not guarantee fairness?
- Models always add the attribute back automatically
- Laws require the attribute to be included
- Correlated proxies such as zip code can carry the same information
- Removing features always lowers accuracy to zero
- Which technique chooses group-specific thresholds, sometimes randomized, to equalize true and false positive rates?
- Hardt et al.'s post-processing, available as Fairlearn's ThresholdOptimizer
- AIF360 Reweighing
- Dropout regularization
- Principal component analysis
- Why should fairness metrics be reported with confidence intervals and for intersectional subgroups?
- Because the four-fifths rule requires exactly three decimal places
- Because intersectional groups always have identical rates
- Because Fairlearn cannot calculate point estimates
- Because small groups make rate estimates noisy, and a model can look fair on single attributes while failing a combination of them
Keep testing yourself
More quizzes picked for your level.